![]()
TOWN OF HINGHAM
BOARD OF APPEALS
IN THE MATTER OF:
Applicant and Property Owner: Gregory M. Synnott and Amee Bergin Synnott
7 Bayberry Road
Hingham, MA 02043
Subject Property: 7 Bayberry Road
Hingham, MA 02043
Deed Reference: Plymouth County Registry of Deeds
Land Court Certificate of Title No. 104999,
Book 524, Page 199
SUMMARY OF PROCEEDINGS
This matter came before the Board of Appeals on the application of Gregory M. Synnott and Amee Bergin Synnott (“Applicants”) for a side yard setback Variance from §IV-A of the Zoning By-Law and such other relief as necessary to construct an addition to the existing single-family dwelling, at 7 Bayberry Road, in Residence District A.
A public hearing was duly held on Thursday, March 19, 2009 at the Hingham Town Hall before a panel consisting of regular members W. Tod McGrath, Chairman, Joseph M. Fisher and Joseph W. Freeman.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The existing attached garage is 10’ from the side yard property line and the Applicants are proposing to construct the addition behind the garage. The addition is proposed to be approximately 12’-13’ to the side property line and will be connected to the garage by a porch. The proposed addition would expand, by approximately 8’, the footprint of the existing dwelling and would encroach no further into the side yard setback than the existing garage. The proposed addition would expand, by approximately 16’, the footprint of the dwelling to the rear and will meet the rear setback requirements. The Applicants presented elevation plans showing that the addition will not exceed the height of the present dwelling.
The Applicants represented themselves. No abutters spoke for or against the granting of the Variance.
The Board voted unanimously to GRANT the VARIANCE. In granting the requested relief, the Board found that owing to circumstances relating to the soil conditions, shape or topography which especially affect the premises, but do not affect generally the zoning district in which the premises are located, a literal enforcement of the Zoning By-Law would create a hardship to the Applicants.
The Board determined that the narrow shape of the lot combined with the coverage from the existing dwelling and the lack of alternative locations upon which the addition could be located, limited the placement of the proposed addition to within current side-yard non-conformity of the existing structure. The Board also determined that although the proposed addition will intrude approximately 3’ into the side yard setback, it will not encroach further into the side yard setback than the existing garage and will not detract from the neighborhood and will not impose on the abutting property.
The Board further noted that the dwellings in this area of Bayberry Road and Bradley Woods Drive are often located within the side yard setbacks, and determined that the requested Variance might be granted without detriment to the public good and without substantially derogating from the intent or purpose of the Zoning By-Law.
The Variance is granted subject the following condition:
1. That the addition be constructed in substantial accordance with the plans presented in the application and the representations made at the public hearing, particularly that the intrusion into the side yard setback be no more than 3’.
This decision shall not take effect until a copy of the decision bearing the certification of the
For the Board of Appeals,
_____________________
Joseph M. Fisher
April 6, 2009